Compare
DVL-0031Specimen Record

Citipati

SIT-ih-PAH-tee oz-MOLE-skay

Illustration of Citipati osmolskae
  • Head Crest: A hollow, horn-covered crest sat on top of the skull — and some beautifully preserved fossils show it in amazing detail. Like the crest on a modern cassowary, it was probably used to show off and help other Citipati recognize each other, not for fighting.
  • Toothless Beak: That deep, powerful beak had zero teeth — perfect for cracking seeds, raiding nests for eggs, or chomping tough plants. This made Citipati a surprisingly flexible eater that could survive on all kinds of food.
  • Wing Feathers: Bumpy attachment points on the arm bones prove that big, proper feathers were anchored there. Even cooler? Citipati almost certainly used those feathered wings to sit on its eggs and keep them warm — exactly like birds do today.
  • Tail Fan: The tail bones were fused together at the tip, which strongly suggests a fancy fan of feathers spread out at the end — think peacock vibes. This flashy tail was almost certainly used to impress mates and signal to others of its kind.

This feathered dinosaur was caught in the act—fossils show it died protecting its nest of eggs, arms spread wide like a modern bird sheltering its young.

Did you know?
  • The brooding specimens show Citipati positioned its arms exactly like modern birds do when incubating—a behavior that evolved before flight feathers became wings

About

Citipati osmolskae was a large oviraptorid dinosaur from the Late Cretaceous of Mongolia, around 75 to 71 million years ago. With its distinctive tall, cassowary-like head , toothless beak, and fully feathered body, it would have cut a striking figure in the ancient Gobi Desert environment. At roughly 2.5 to 3 meters long, it was one of the largest known oviraptorids.

The most remarkable aspect of Citipati is how it was preserved. Multiple specimens have been found in positions directly on top of their nests, with arms spread protectively over the eggs in a posture identical to how modern birds incubate. These individuals were likely killed suddenly by sandstorms and preserved in the act of parenting, providing some of the most compelling evidence linking dinosaur behavior to that of living birds.

Discovered at Ukhaa Tolgod in the Djadochta Formation during American Museum of Natural History expeditions in the 1990s, Citipati was formally named in 2001 by James Clark, Mark Norell, and Rinchen Barsbold. The genus name means 'funeral pyre lord,' a reference to a figure in Buddhist mythology, while the species honors Polish paleontologist Halszka Osmólska.

For decades, the famous brooding specimens were mistakenly attributed to Oviraptor—ironically, this means the very evidence that 'egg thief' was actually a caring parent belonged to a different dinosaur entirely. Citipati's diet remains debated, but its powerful beak could likely handle a variety of foods including hard-shelled prey, plants, and small animals.

Quick Facts

Scientific name
Citipati osmolskae
Group
Theropod · Oviraptoridae
Lived
Late Cretaceous, 100–66 million years ago
Diet
Omnivore
Movement
Walked on two legs
Discovery credited to
1995, American Museum of Natural History Expeditions
Holotype
IGM 100/978 · Institute of Geology, Ulaanbaatar
DinoVault record
DVL-0031

Where Citipati osmolskae Roamed

Loading map…

During the late Cretaceous, Citipati osmolskae inhabited the semi-arid floodplains and dune fields of what is now the Gobi Desert region of Mongolia, part of the vast Asian landmass that lay far from major seaways. This dynamic landscape featured seasonal streams, scattered oases, and sweeping sand dunes where violent sandstorms occasionally buried nesting dinosaurs in place, preserving remarkable snapshots of their brooding behavior.

Keep exploring the vault

Sources & Citation

Cite this record

Records are updated as research changes, so citations include the date you accessed this page.

Length estimates
Clark et al. 2001; multiple well-preserved specimens
Height estimates
Estimated from skeletal proportions; Clark et al. 2001
Weight estimates
Paul 2010; estimates based on skeletal dimensions
Speed estimates
Inferred from limb proportions; no direct evidence