DVL-0064Specimen Record
Illustration of Megalosaurus bucklandii

Megalosaurus

Megalosaurus bucklandii

MEG-ah-low-SOR-us BUCK-land-ee-eye

The first dinosaur ever scientifically named, Megalosaurus was terrorizing Middle Jurassic England nearly 200 years before T. rex became famous.

Did you know?

A Megalosaurus thigh bone illustrated in 1676 was the first dinosaur bone ever depicted in scientific literature—though it was thought to be from a giant human

About

Megalosaurus holds an extraordinary place in scientific history as the very first dinosaur to receive a formal scientific name, described by William Buckland in 1824. This large prowled the subtropical forests and floodplains of what is now Oxfordshire, England, during the Middle Jurassic period, around 166 million years ago. As a powerful , it likely hunted the sauropods and ornithopods that shared its environment.

This carnivore was built for predation, with robust jaws lined with , blade-like teeth designed for slicing through flesh. Its strong hindlimbs supported a muscular body, while relatively short but powerful forelimbs ended in sharp claws. Though not as large as later giants like Allosaurus or Tyrannosaurus, Megalosaurus was still a formidable hunter of its time, capable of taking down substantial prey.

The discovery history of Megalosaurus is a fascinating chapter in paleontology. Fossils were actually found decades before Buckland's description—a partial was illustrated as early as 1676 and was initially interpreted as belonging to a giant human or biblical giant. Buckland recognized these bones as reptilian and coined the name meaning 'great lizard.' Ironically, for over a century afterward, Megalosaurus became a taxonomic 'wastebasket,' with theropod remains from around the world incorrectly assigned to it.

Today, only material from the Taynton Limestone Formation of Oxfordshire is considered true Megalosaurus bucklandii. The incomplete nature of the known fossils—primarily jaw fragments, , and limb bones—means that many aspects of its appearance remain uncertain, and the famous Victorian reconstructions showing it as a dragon-like beast were dramatically wrong.

First described1824
Discovered byWilliam Buckland
Type specimenOUM J13505